top of page
Want to have the latest History Notes delivered right to your inbox weekly? Head over to Sign Up for Our Newsletter to get History Notes sent to your email every Thursday morning! 


We are all familiar with the story of Frankenstein written by Mary Shelley—perhaps from one of the many movies inspired by the book.  My favorite is the comedic version from 1974 starring Gene Wilder, Madeline Kahn, and Teri Garr— “it’s pronounced Fronkensteen!” But in the museum world, a Frankenstein is not a monster but an object made up of parts of other artifacts. This goes beyond the repair of a broken foot or a replaced caned seat. Sometimes they are made to deceive, but other times they are just pragmatic uses of the still-functional parts made into a new “whole.”


This Queen Anne-style table (Acc. # 19xx-99) was described in the records as a 17th-century mahogany table from the Williams family. It could be referred to as a pier table—or a table designed to be placed against a wall--often between two windows. This table does have some old elements—the graceful cabriole legs with their “pad” feet appear to be old.  The disc-like extensions on the bottom of the legs have been altered, and modern pieces have been substituted.  More modern screws in the bottom reveal where casters used to be. 


When the top is examined from underneath (yes, we have done this!) it does not have the darkened patina appearance that we would expect for a table of its era. It also has some extra bracing that would suggest that the top was originally a marble top. The table has been cut down lengthwise at some point.


Next, we looked at the shell carving on the front and “knees” of the legs.  The shell is fairly simple and the finish on the shells is oddly different. 



Finally, we looked at the spiral applied carvings on the front and sides of the table.  They look suspiciously familiar…AHA!  The Storrs House Museum contains a wonderful piece of case furniture, referred to as a bookcase-on-desk.  Only four examples from this maker are currently known; two are in the collections of Historic Deerfield, one is privately owned in Hartford, and ours.  The top of the bonnet features three ball finials.  We had wondered if those elements were missing a flame finial at the top, as many pieces of this type had. This theory was furthered when we found a flame finial in the attic of the Storrs House several years ago.  Placing that finial against the spiral elements on this table—it’s a match!  So, two old finials were split in half and applied to the front and side skirts of this "Frankenstein" table, leaving one lonely remaining finial to reside in the attic!  Did they come from the big case piece, perhaps removed when it proved too tall to be moved into another room?



We will likely never know when this table was “created” or learn whether it was a deliberate act of fakery or just a frugal Yankee making use of what was handy.  We have several theories—one is that the table did truly belong to the Williams family.  When Stephen Williams’ parsonage house burned down in 1846, several items were rescued and brought to the Storrs House. While this table is not listed among those items, perhaps someone dropped it during that emergency, breaking the stone or marble top.  Being practical, and wanting to preserve this important relic of a beloved minister, perhaps someone replaced the broken top with mahogany boards.  Since the Storrs House was smaller than the Williams house, the space between the windows was also smaller, necessitating a shorter table.  We’re still on the hunt for an explanation! 


-Contributed by Betsy McKee, Longmeadow Historical Society Board Member 



Sources: Connecticut Valley Furniture: Eliphalet Chapin and His Contemporaries, 1750-1800, by Thomas P. Kugelman, Alice P. Kugelman, and with Robert Lionetti; The Furniture of Historic Deerfield, by Dean A. Fales, Jr.; American Furniture, edited by Luke Beckerdite and William N. Hosley; American Furniture 1620 to the Present, by Jonathan L. Fairbanks and Elizabeth Bidwell Bates; Boston Furniture 1700-1900, edited by Brock Jobe and Gerald W. R. Ward; Furniture Treasury, by Wallace Nutting.  We also picked the brains of several furniture experts and curators!


Pitch Pine Credit Wikipedia User Famartin


Recently, a former resident of Franklin Road inquired about the origin of the name of the brook and dingle that ran behind his childhood home; Tar Kiln Dingle Brook. 



Map Showing Tar Kiln Dingle Brook (Credit Town of Longmeadow)


So what is a tar kiln? Why would it have been in that location? Who owned and operated it and why? 


A tar kiln is a device used to produce pine tar by melting it out of dead pine trees. To create a tar kiln, first a large pit was dug in the ground. Next a trench was dug out one side of the pit down hill. Then both the pit and the trench were lined with clay. After that, the pine wood was piled in the pit with pine rich heart wood or stumps on the bottom and light wood at the top. Then the wood was covered in dirt that had been dug out from the pit leaving a small portion of the light wood uncovered. Finally, the light wood would be lit on fire. 



Tar Kiln Diagram: Credit George Wilkinson


The fire and dirt would create an oven that would cause the pine tar to melt out of the heartwood or stumps. The clay at the bottom of the pit would prevent the tar from seeping into the sandy soil and the trench would allow the tar to flow into a barrel. 


The brook and dingle made for an ideal place for a tar kiln. The brook supplied the clay to line the kiln and the dingle provided the necessary slope for the trench to allow the tar to flow into the waiting barrel. 



A Bottle of Pine Tar Credit Wikipedia


So what was it used for? Pine tar had many uses including wood preservation (especially for boats and ships), rope preservation,  a sealant for roofs and as an ingredient of products like printing press ink and turpentine. 


So who owned it? Unfortunately, I was unable to find an answer. The earliest mention of the place by name comes from a 1911 address given on the occasion of the commemoration of the 275 anniversary of the settlement of Springfield and it does not list much about its origins. 



Credit Connecticut Valley Historical Society 


While we do not know who owned the tar kiln, we can infer much about its use based on its location and the economic activity that was happening in town during the colonial period and the early years of our country. 



1831 Map Longmeadow Historical Society Archives


The brook existed right near the town’s saw mill. The saw mill would have provided wood for the kiln as well as customers that were seeking a wood preservation agent. In particular, this must have been of use to the flat boat men like Captain John Cooley and William Hixon who would have needed pine tar to both seal the wood on their hulls and the rope they used on their boats. 


Finished products that contained pine tar, such as turpentine and printing ink, were produced locally as well. The below ads placed in local papers document a once vibrant cottage industry that both produced products for local markets, but for international markets like the West Indies too. 



Ad for Pine Tar and Derived Products: Credit Springfield Republican April 20, 1825



Ad by Longmeadow Resident Nathaniel Ely for Printing Ink Derived from Pine Tar: 

Federal Spy September 10, 1793


Like many other products, the Industrial Revolution allowed pine tar to be produced cheaply leading to the decline of cottage industries like the tar kiln at Tar Kiln Dingle Brook. In the end, all we are left with is the name that reminds us of a once thriving industry in our region. 


Special thanks to Stephen Bearce for submitting this inquiry and to Al McKee, Lenny Shaker, and Dave Marinelli for their assistance with researching this topic. 


Sources: 


Barrows, Charles H. An historical address delivered before the citizens of Springfield in Massachusetts at the public celebration, of the two hundred and seventy-fifth anniversary of the settlement; with five appendices, viz: Meaning of Indian local names, The cartography of Springfield, Old place names in Springfield, Unrecorded deed of Nippumsuit, Unrecorded deed of Paupsunnuck. Springfield, Mass., Connecticut Valley historical society, 1916. Pdf. https://www.loc.gov/item/16015737/


Gluck, Emily. “Yankee Tarheels: Remembering the Pitch Pine Industry of Colonial America.” Northern Woodlands, June 2015. 


Kaye, Theodore P. “Pine Tar; History and Uses.” San Francisco National Maritime Park Association , July 7, 1997. https://maritime.org/conf/conf-kaye-tar.php


Secretary of State, and Thomas Jefferson, Report of the Secretary of State, on the Privileges and Restrictions on the Commerce of the United States in Foreign Countries § (1793). 


Storrs, Richard Salter. Proceedings at the Centennial Celebration of the Incorporation of the Town of Longmeadow, October 17th, 1883. Google Books. Longmeadow, Massachusetts: Secretary of the Centennial Committee, under authority of the town, 1884. https://books.google.com/books?id=1mGEiuq3P4EC&printsec=frontcover&client=firefox-a&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false







20 views1 comment

Mary Ann Allard Booth was born on September 8, 1843 to Rhoda and Samuel Colton Booth of Longmeadow. She was a direct descendant of the infamous Longmeadow resident “Marchant” Colton, a wealthy merchant and ship owner in the 18th century. Her family genealogy can be traced back to Englishman William Boothe in 1275. Samuel Booth, a farmer, was also well known as a geologist and mineralogist. His large collection was donated to the Springfield Museums after his death in 1895, and is still on display today.


As a child Mary Ann suffered from “chronic invalidism,” likely Polio (infantile paralysis). She was educated in the Longmeadow public schools and Wilbraham Academy. She later began a great self-directed study of science. In 1877 she obtained her first microscope and began studying plant and insect life. Mary Ann eventually took up photography and adapted the microscope to the camera and embarked upon her work in the nascent field of photomicroscopy and was selling her microscopy slides by 1884.



As an amateur scientist she gained international recognition. At the time very few women achieved renown in the scientific community. 



In 1885 she received first prize at the New Orleans Exposition and a medal the the St. Louis Exposition in 1904. Ms. Booth gained further celebrity in assisting the U.S. Surgeon General in 1907-08 in combatting the Bubonic Plague in San Francisco through photomicroscopic documentation of the the germ-bearing fleas that transmitted the plague from rats. She was elected as a fellow of the Royal Microscopical Society of London, the Royal Photographic Society of Great Britain, the Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences, the New York Academy of Science, the American Microscopical Society, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and was the first female recipient of the Order of William Pynchon. It was said that she had the largest private collection of parasites in the country. She wrote scientific books and pamphlets and lectured on parasites.



After the death of her father in 1895 Mary Ann moved to Dartmouth St in Springfield.


 In 1901 she was the first woman in Springfield to own an automobile. Her first automobile was steam powered and a subsequent car was electric.




Mary Ann never married and lived independently in a home she owned outright. Census data shows she hired a live-in servant or companion. On September 16, 1922 she died of “apoplexy” (stroke) in her yard. She left an estate worth $91,314 equivalent to $1,672,000 today. For more on Mary Ann Allard Booth further details please check out https://antiqueslides.net/mary-ann-booth-american-woman-microscopist-scientist/ and http://microscopist.net/BoothMA.html

 

Resources

  1. Microscopist.net

  2. Boston Herald

  3. Springfield Republican

  4. Longmeadow Historical Society

65 views1 comment
bottom of page